Skip to content
October 2026 edition · Methodology GNT-BDS v1.1.1 · Last updated 2026-10-23日本語 / English
Japan IR IndexIndependent research · English disclosure & shareholder communication
Company

JUKI

6440 · TSE

Cite as: Japan IR Index, JUKI (6440), methodology GNT-BDS v1.1.1, reviewed 2026-09.

Findings and sources as of the review date shown. The company’s English disclosure may have changed since.

English disclosureCapital-policy review — not coveredBalance sheet — not covered

Where to start

Chosen from this company's lowest answers, easiest first. A quick fix uses material the company already has; a translation fix is usually met by translating a Japanese document (our note says whether this company has one). Questions that need a budget or a board decision are left out. Suggestions drawn from the research, separate from the scores.

  1. F6 Multi-year financial data file (Excel or CSV) downloadable in English 0/5 Quick fix

    Post the financial figures the company already publishes as an Excel or CSV file with English labels.

    Our note · Examples to follow

  2. G6 Shareholder vote results disclosed in English 0/5 Quick fix

    Publish the vote counts from the Japanese extraordinary report in English.

    Our note · Examples to follow

  3. O7 Named English IR contact published 2/5 Quick fix

    Link a dedicated IR contact (form, address or e-mail) from the English IR section.

    Our note · Examples to follow

  4. R4 English disclosure free of machine-translation accuracy disclaimers 3/5 Quick fix

    Have the English pages reviewed so that no machine-translation notice is needed.

    Our note · Examples to follow

English disclosure assessment69.2 of 100 · 100% reached
69.2of 100 · 100% of questions reached · scored against GNT-BDS v1.1.1

All 34 questions reviewed by the editor against the public documents; this is not an independent audit. 1 answer corrected after re-checks (research errors) on 23 Oct 2026. These are changes to our record, not to the company’s disclosure. Changes to this record →

Compared with peers

Peer groupMedianThis company
Same sector (Machinery)76.428 of 39
Same size band (Under ¥100bn)51.48 of 25

Compared with the companies covered here, not the whole market. Sector is the TSE 33-sector classification; market cap is from the TSE English-disclosure survey, Aug 2026; it only sets the size band, plays no part in the score, and is refreshed once a quarter. Ties share the higher rank.

Financial disclosure8 of 8 questions · weight 30%65.0
Strategic disclosure7 of 7 questions · weight 25%68.6
Governance disclosure7 of 7 questions · weight 20%68.6
English IR website7 of 7 questions · weight 15%85.7
Japanese–English parity5 of 5 questions · weight 10%60.0

Out of 100.

Of the 34 questions reviewed, 27 scored 3 or more and 4 found no qualifying English materials within the stated review scope. Read each score with its source and scope below.

Findings by question

QQuestionScore
Financial disclosure
F1Quarterly and full-year results summaries (tanshin) published in English5/5
F2English results summary is a full translation, not an excerpt4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

F3Financial statements including notes available in English4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

F4Annual securities report available in English in any form0/5

No annual securities report (yukashoken hokokusho) found across juki.co.jp/en/ir/library/ financial, financial-results, business-report, meeting, integrated-report, governance-report or management pages, on 21 Sep 2026.

Examples to follow for this question →

F5Segment revenue and profit disclosed in English, consistent definitions4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

F6Multi-year financial data file (Excel or CSV) downloadable in English0/5

juki.co.jp/en/ir/finance/ (Financial Highlights) is a single-year narrative page with no downloadable multi-year Excel/CSV data file; checked via browser 21 Sep 2026. Note this page's commentary is also stale (FY2024 figures) despite FY2025/FY2026 results being current elsewhere on the site.

Examples to follow for this question →

F7Guidance disclosed in English with the basis explained4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

F8English financial disclosure current to the latest Japanese filing period5/5
Strategic disclosure
S1Medium-term management plan in English with numerical targets4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S2IR presentations published in English5/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S3English equity-story or investment-highlights page3/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S4Growth drivers identified and quantified in English4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S5Results-briefing transcripts or Q&A published in English3/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S6Integrated or annual report available in English5/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

S7Progress against the previous plan, including misses, explained in English0/5

Neither the FY2025 full-year results briefing (n260218e.pdf) nor the 2025-2029 medium-term plan (n250213_04e.pdf.pdf) nor the Integrated Report 2025 names the prior 'Value up2022' plan or gives a target-vs-actual comparison against it; checked 21 Sep 2026.

Examples to follow for this question →

Governance disclosure
G1Corporate governance report available in English5/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

G2Director biographies in English with tenure, expertise and independence5/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

G3Board skills matrix published in English5/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

G4Executive remuneration structure and its performance linkage explained in English4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

G5AGM notice in English with sufficient lead time to vote4/5

The September record scored 5 without a note, on the English notice of the 2026 meeting (source link). Re-checked 23 Oct 2026 (G5 voting-site sweep, after the independent audit): the corporate governance report names Mizuho Trust & Banking, whose voting website, soukai.mizuho-tb.co.jp, is in Japanese only, with no English option, as for ESPEC (6859) and Nitto Boseki (3110). Every proposal in English, but a Japanese-only voting route, so 4. Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

G6Shareholder vote results disclosed in English0/5

juki.co.jp/en/ir/library/meeting/ lists only convocation notices (FY2014-FY2025); none of them report vote tallies or resolution outcomes, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Examples to follow for this question →

G7Cross-shareholdings in English with reduction schedule and rationale1/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

English IR website
O1English IR section reachable within two clicks of the English homepage4/5
O2English document links resolve to English documents5/5
O3English IR archive free of dead links5/5
O4English IR pages render without blank JavaScript failures5/5
O5Single page listing all English IR documents by date and type4/5
O6English archive genuinely populated, not an unverifiable shell5/5
O7Named English IR contact published2/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

Japanese–English parity
R1Earnings materials published in English simultaneously with Japanese4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

R2Median lag in days between Japanese and English statutory publication3/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

R3Timely disclosures published in English4/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

R4English disclosure free of machine-translation accuracy disclaimers3/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

R5English version stated as authoritative, not subordinate to Japanese1/5

Source document →

Examples to follow for this question →

Open a question for the reasoning and the document its score was read from. A zero means no qualifying English materials were located within the stated review scope as of the review date. Compare this question across companies →

Capital-policy reviewnot covered

No capital action has been reviewed for this company yet. The monitor covers a selection of companies and, within them, a selection of actions. See the companies covered →

Balance sheet and capital-policy indicatorsnot covered

No balance-sheet reading has been published for this company. See the companies covered →

Changes to this record

Every change is labelled as a research error, new evidence supplied, improved disclosure or a rule change, with its date and the previous score. Change log →

Scores assess how English information is published, not the quality of the business or its investment value. To report an error or a document we missed, see how to contact us.

Back to all companies